Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon in coronary lesions: a real-world, all-comers study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Backgrounds

Although drug-eluting stents are the most common interventional devices for patients with coronary disease, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) represent a novel therapeutic alternative in certain scenarios. This prospective, observational all-comers study explored the clinical outcomes of DCB use in patients with coronary lesions.

Methods and results

All patients treated with DCBs were enrolled in this study, including patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) or de novo lesions. The primary outcome was the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at one year.

We enrolled 2306 patients with 2660 lesions and performed DCB angioplasty in 399 patients (17.3%) with ISR and 1907 patients (82.7%) with de novo lesions. During follow-up (366 ± 46 days), the TLR rate was lower in the de novo lesion group (1.31%) compared to the ISR group (7.02%) [odds ratio (OR) 0.176, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.101–0.305, p < 0.001]. Patients with de novo lesions had a lower yearly incidence of MACE compared to ISR patients (2.73 vs. 9.27%, respectively, OR 0.274, 95% CI 0.177–0.424, p < 0.001) and a lower incidence of any revascularization (5.09 vs. 13.03%, OR 0.358, 95% CI 0.251–0.510, p < 0.001). No significant differences between groups were observed in the rates of cardiac death (OR 0.783, 95% CI 0.258–2.371, p = 0.655) or MI (OR 0.696, 95% CI 0.191–2.540, p = 0.573).

Conclusions

DCB angioplasty in this all-comers, real-world, prospective study was safe and efficient with low TLR and MACE rates. Thus, DCB appears to be an attractive alternative for the stent-less treatment of de novo coronary lesions.

Graphic abstract

ISR in-stent restenosis; OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval; TLR target lesion revascularization; MACE major adverse cardiovascular events; MI myocardial infraction. MACE defined as the composite outcome of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Any revascularization includes any percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

CAD coronary artery disease, DCB drug-coated balloon, ISR in-stent restenosis

Fig. 2

ISR in-stent restenosis, TLR target lesion revascularization, MACE major adverse cardiovascular events, MI myocardial infraction In each panel, the inset shows the same data on an enlarged y axis

Fig. 3

ISR in-stent restenosis, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, ACS acute coronary syndrome

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gruntzig A (1978) Transluminal dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis. Lancet 1(8058):263. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90500-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Byrne RA, Joner M, Kastrati A (2015) Stent thrombosis and restenosis: what have we learned and where are we going? The Andreas Gruntzig Lecture ESC 2014. Eur Heart J 36(47):3320–3331. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv511

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Buccheri D, Piraino D, Andolina G, Cortese B (2016) Understanding and managing in-stent restenosis: a review of clinical data, from pathogenesis to treatment. J Thorac Dis 8(10):E1150–E1162. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.10.93

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu W, Zhu Y, Han Z, Wang X, Wang X, Qiu C (2017) Drug-coated balloon in combination with bare metal stent strategy for de novo coronary artery disease: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(12):e6397. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang X, Lu W, Wang X, Pan L, Fu W, Liu Q, Han Z, Sun G, Qin X, Li R, Zheng X, Shan Y, Qiu C (2020) Drug-coated balloon angioplasty: predicting outcomes based on different patterns of drug-eluting stent restenosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 36(2):171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01681-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu W, Zhu Y, Han Z, Sun G, Qin X, Wang Z, Liu G, Xi W, Wang X, Pan L, Qiu C (2019) Short-term outcomes from drug-coated balloon for coronary de novo lesions in large vessels. J Cardiol 73(2):151–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.07.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeger RV, Farah A, Ohlow MA, Mangner N, Mobius-Winkler S, Weilenmann D, Wohrle J, Stachel G, Markovic S, Leibundgut G, Rickenbacher P, Osswald S, Cattaneo M, Gilgen N, Kaiser C, Scheller B, Investigators B-S (2020) Long-term efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): 3 year follow-up of a randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 396(10261):1504–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32173-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ali RM, Degenhardt R, Zambahari R, Tresukosol D, Ahmad WA, Kamar H, Kui-Hian S, Ong TK, bin Ismail O, bin Elis S, Udychalerm W, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Unverdorben M (2011) Paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty and cobalt-chromium stents versus conventional angioplasty and paclitaxel eluting stents in the treatment of native coronary artery stenoses in patients with diabetes mellitus. EuroIntervention. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV7SKA15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A, Juni P, Kastrati A, KolhMauri PL, Montalescot G, Neumann FJ, Petricevic M, Roffi M, Steg PG, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Levine GN, Group ESCSD Guidelines ESCCfP Societies ESCNC (2018) 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 39(3):213–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, StefaniniWindecker GGS, Yadav R, Zembala MO, Group, ESCSD (2019) 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 40(2):87–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huber MS, Mooney JF, Madison J, Mooney MR (1991) Use of a morphologic classification to predict clinical outcome after dissection from coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 68(5):467–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90780-o

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD, Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology /American College of Cardiology /American Heart Association /World Heart Federation Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial I (2018) Fourth Universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol 72(18):2231–2264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gada H, Kirtane AJ, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Mahaffey KW, Cutlip DE, Sudhir K, Hou L, Koo K, Stone GW (2013) 5 year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6(12):1263–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamaji K, Kimura T, Morimoto T, Nakagawa Y, Inoue K, Soga Y, Arita T, Shirai S, Ando K, Kondo K, Sakai K, Goya M, Iwabuchi M, Yokoi H, Nosaka H, Nobuyoshi M (2010) Very long-term (15–20 years) clinical and angiographic outcome after coronary bare metal stent implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3(5):468–475. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.958249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang DM, Chen S (2020) In-stent restenosis and a drug-coated balloon: insights from a clinical therapeutic strategy on coronary artery diseases. Cardiol Res Pract 2020:8104939. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8104939

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Bohm M, Speck U (2006) Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med 355(20):2113–2124. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scheller B, Clever YP, Kelsch B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Speck U, Bohm M, Cremers B (2012) Long-term follow-up after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5(3):323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.01.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Byrne RA, Neumann FJ, Mehilli J, Pinieck S, Wolff B, Tiroch K, Schulz S, Fusaro M, Ott I, Ibrahim T, Hausleiter J, Valina C, Pache J, Laugwitz KL, Massberg S, Kastrati A, Investigators I-D (2013) Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet 381(9865):461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61964-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cuesta J, Rivero F, Garcia-Touchard A, Garcia Del Blanco B, Investigators RI (2018) Paclitaxel-eluting balloons or everolimus-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 11(5):505–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.11.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yerasi C, Case BC, Forrestal BJ, Torguson R, Weintraub WS, Garcia-Garcia HM, Waksman R (2020) Drug-coated balloon for de novo coronary artery disease: jacc state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 75(9):1061–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wohrle J, Zadura M, Mobius-Winkler S, Leschke M, Opitz C, Ahmed W, Barragan P, Simon JP, Cassel G, Scheller B (2012) SeQuentPlease World Wide Registry: clinical results of SeQuent please paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in a large-scale, prospective registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(18):1733–1738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Unverdorben M, Kleber FX, Heuer H, Figulla HR, Vallbracht C, Leschke M, Cremers B, Hardt S, Buerke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Degenhardt R, Scheller B (2010) Treatment of small coronary arteries with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. Clin Res Cardiol 99(3):165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-009-0101-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenberg M, Waliszewski M, Chin K, Ahmad WAW, Caramanno G, Milazzo D, Nuruddin AA, Liew HB, Maskon O, Aubry P, Poyet R, Frey N (2019) Prospective, large-scale multicenter trial for the use of drug-coated balloons in coronary lesions: The DCB-only All-Comers Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93(2):181–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Funatsu A, Nakamura S, Inoue N, Nanto S, Nakamura M, Iwabuchi M, Ando K, Asano R, Habara S, Saito S, Kozuma K, Mitsudo K (2017) A multicenter randomized comparison of paclitaxel-coated balloon with plain balloon angioplasty in patients with small vessel disease. Clin Res Cardiol 106(10):824–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1126-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rissanen TT, Uskela S, Eranen J, Mantyla P, Olli A, Romppanen H, Siljander A, Pietila M, Minkkinen MJ, Tervo J, Karkkainen JM, Investigators Dt (2019) Drug-coated balloon for treatment of de-novo coronary artery lesions in patients with high bleeding risk (DEBUT): a single-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 394(10194):230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31126-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cortese B, Micheli A, Picchi A, Coppolaro A, Bandinelli L, Severi S, Limbruno U (2010) Paclitaxel-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent during PCI of small coronary vessels, a prospective randomised clinical trial. The PICCOLETO Study Heart 96(16):1291–1296. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.195057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jeger RV, Farah A, Ohlow MA, Mangner N, Mobius-Winkler S, Leibundgut G, Weilenmann D, Wohrle J, Richter S, Schreiber M, Mahfoud F, Linke A, Stephan FP, Mueller C, Rickenbacher P, Coslovsky M, Gilgen N, Osswald S, Kaiser C, Scheller B, Investigators B-S (2018) Drug-coated balloons for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): an open-label randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 392(10150):849–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31719-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Siontis GC, Piccolo R, Praz F, Valgimigli M, Raber L, Mavridis D, Juni P, Windecker S (2016) Percutaneous coronary interventions for the treatment of stenoses in small coronary arteries: a network meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(13):1324–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Y, Zhang YJ, Deng LX, Yin ZY, Hu T, Wang Q, Li Y, Li JY, Guo WY, Mou FJ, Tao L (2019) 12 month clinical results of drug-coated balloons for de novo coronary lesion in vessels exceeding 3.0 mm. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 35(4):579–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1505-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu X, Ji F, Xu F, Zhang W, Wang X, Lu D, Yang C, Wang F (2019) Treatment of large de novo coronary lesions with paclitaxel-coated balloon only: results from a Chinese institute. Clin Res Cardiol 108(3):234–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1346-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cortese B, Silva Orrego P, Agostoni P, Buccheri D, Piraino D, Andolina G, Seregni RG (2015) Effect of drug-coated balloons in native coronary artery disease left with a dissection. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8(15):2003–2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mitomo S, Jabbour RJ, Mangieri A, Ancona M, Regazzoli D, Tanaka A, Giannini F, Carlino M, Montorfano M, Chieffo A, Latib A, Colombo A (2018) Mid-term clinical outcomes after bailout drug-eluting stenting for suboptimal drug-coated balloon results: Insights from a Milan registry. Int J Cardiol 263:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all professors (especially Luosha Zhao, Feifei Zhang, Youyou Du and Guanghui Liu) and study students involved in this study. This work was financially supported by Medical Science and Technique Research Plan of He’nan Province (Provincial and Ministerial Co-construction Project) (Grant No. SB201901027 & SB201901010).

Funding

This work was financially supported by Medical Science and Technique Research Plan of He’nan Province (Provincial and Ministerial Co-construction Project) (Grant No. SB201901027 & SB201901010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: CGQ, WJL, ZYH, and LP. Data curation: SCP, XW, PQ, YGS, YJZ, SZ, QWS, WCZ, SG, XLW, XLZ, RL, PSZ, and ZSQ. Formal analysis: CGQ and LP. Funding and acquisition: CGQ and ZYH. Investigation: all authors. Methodology: CGQ, WJL, and ZYH. Project administration, recources and supervision: CGQ and ZYH. Resources: CGQ, ZYH, GJS, XFQ, SCP, PSZ, and ZWH. Visualization: LP. Writing original draft: LP and WJL. Writing, review and editing: all authors. All authors gave final approval of the manuscript, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunguang Qiu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that may be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The protocol was approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 21 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, L., Lu, W., Han, Z. et al. Clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon in coronary lesions: a real-world, all-comers study. Clin Res Cardiol 111, 732–741 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01895-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01895-y

Keywords

Navigation