Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Association between triglyceride glucose index and arterial stiffness and coronary artery calcification: a systematic review and exposure-effect meta-analysis

Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 22, Article number: 111 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The triglyceride and glucose (TyG) index has been linked to various cardiovascular diseases. However, it's still unclear whether the TyG index is associated with arterial stiffness and coronary artery calcification (CAC).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies until September 2022 in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. We used a random-effects model to calculate the pooled effect estimate and the robust error meta-regression method to summarize the exposure-effect relationship.

Results

Twenty-six observational studies involving 87,307 participants were included. In the category analysis, the TyG index was associated with the risk of arterial stiffness (odds ratio [OR]: 1.83; 95% CI 1.55–2.17, I2 = 68%) and CAC (OR: 1.66; 95% CI 1.51–1.82, I2 = 0). The per 1-unit increment in the TyG index was also associated with an increased risk of arterial stiffness (OR: 1.51, 95% CI 1.35–1.69, I2 = 82%) and CAC (OR: 1.73, 95% CI 1.36–2.20, I2 = 51%). Moreover, a higher TyG index was shown to be a risk factor for the progression of CAC (OR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.21–2.27, I2 = 0, in category analysis, OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.29–1.68, I2 = 41% in continuity analysis). There was a positive nonlinear association between the TyG index and the risk of arterial stiffness (Pnonlinearity < 0.001).

Conclusion

An elevated TyG index is associated with an increased risk of arterial stiffness and CAC. Prospective studies are needed to assess causality.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for nearly a third of all deaths worldwide annually [1], with complex structural and functional changes occur in the arterial system, characterized by coronary artery calcification (CAC) and gradually increasing stiffness of vessels [2]. Recognized as a marker of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, CAC is concomitant with the development of advanced atherosclerosis [3]. Arterial stiffness can cause changes in both the extracellular matrix of elastic arteries and the mechanical properties of the vascular wall, thereby activating the atherosclerotic process [4]. Both are independent predictors for cardiovascular mortality, whose processes reinforce one another, creating vicious cycles in the body [5]. Calculated by triglyceride and glucose, the triglyceride glucose (TyG) index was newly proposed as a reliable and applicable tool for predicting insulin resistance (IR) [6] and may be more reliable than the commonly used indicator for clinical assessment, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), in terms of both sensitivity and specificity [7].

Studies have shown that a higher TyG index is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in the general population [8,9,10]. It is also associated with subclinical cardiovascular diseases, such as arterial stiffness and CAC [11]. Arterial stiffness and CAC are well-known risk factors for cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction [12] or stroke [13]. For example, Wu et al. [14] concluded that participants with a higher TyG index should be aware of the subsequent risk of arterial stiffness progression, and an independent association between the TyG index and extensive abdominal aortic CAC was found by Chen et al. [15]. These findings suggest that the TyG index may serve as a marker independent of traditional risk factors for arterial stiffness and CAC. However, there is no systematic review that critically evaluated their association. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of observational studies to evaluate the association between the TyG index and arterial stiffness and CAC.

Methods:

Protocol and registration

The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/-registration number- CRD42022360981). We reported this systematic review and meta-analysis based on the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) [16], which can be seen in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Literature search

Studies were identified through a systematic search of the electronic databases of Embase (https://www.embase.com/), Cochrane Library (http://www.cochranelibrary.com), and PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) until September 9, 2022, for the most exhaustive literature review. The search terms used were (‘TyG index’, ‘triglyceride-glucose index’, ‘triglyceride and glucose index’ or ‘triglyceride glucose index’) and (‘vascular stiffness’ or ‘brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity’ or ‘CAC’ or ‘coronary artery calcium score’) to identify all eligible reports. Additional file 1: Table S2 describes the full search terms used in each database searched.

Study selection

Two investigators (Q-L and X-Y) independently finished the whole process from the literature search and selection to data analysis. We used Endnote X9 software (Tomson Reuters, New York, NY, USA) to organize all studies. After removing the duplicates automatically and manually, we performed a preliminary screening of the relevant literature by examining the titles and abstracts. When the article or additional information was unavailable, the corresponding author was contacted to obtain information. Afterwards, we performed a full-text reading of the initially screened literature to identify the final available studies. Any discrepancies in this process were resolved by the third reviewer (P-Y).

The inclusion criteria for the studies were as follows according to the PICOS: (1) types of participants: adult (age > 18 years); (2) exposure and comparator: high versus low TyG index level; (3) outcomes: evaluated the association between TyG index and risk or progession of arterial stiffness or CAC; (4) types of studies: observational studies published as full-length articles; and (5) reported the estimated effect for this association with multivariate analysis. We excluded studies if they were reviews, meta-analyses, abstract-only articles, or focused on other outcomes. We also excluded studies with data that could not be extracted or were not reported. We considered a certain degree of elevated CACS or microcalcifications grows into larger calcium fragments [3] as “progression of CAC.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Two review authors (Q-L and X-Y) independently extracted the relevant information from the eligible studies, and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We used predesigned Microsoft Excel 2019 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) for data extraction, and the following data were extracted from the studies: (1) first author name; (2) publication year; (3) country or region; (4) study type; (5) duration of follow-up; (6) basic characteristics (sample size, age, body mass index-BMI and so on); (7) source of participants; (8) outcome; (9) adjustments; (10) hazard ratio (HR) or relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) from the most adjusted model.

For the included cohort studies, the quality and strength of the evidence for each outcome were assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). This is based on the selection and comparability of studies and the determination of the exposure or outcome [17]. Studies gaining more than 6 stars out of a possible 9 were considered to have a low risk of bias. Additionally, we used the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal checklist to analyse the quality of the included cross-sectional studies [18].

Statistical analysis

The TyG index was calculated as Ln(Fasting Triglycerides [mg/dL] × Fasting Plasma Glucose [mg/dL]/2) [19]. Since the meta-analysis included cohort and cross-sectional studies, HRs were treated as ORs. For articles that reported the TyG index as a categorical variable, we extracted the effect estimates of the highest TyG index group versus the lowest TyG index group. In the analysis of continuous variables, the effect estimates of the TyG index per 1-unit increment were evaluated. In cases where continuous data were not available, we used variance-weighted least-squares regression analysis to compute the linear trend [20]. We pooled the data with RevMan software, version 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration 2014, Nordic Cochrane Center Copenhagen, Denmark) and Stata software (Version 16.0, Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, USA), using the generic inverse variance method of Der Simonian and Laird in a random-effects model [20]. We calculated the proportion of the total variability in the effect estimates due to heterogeneity (I2), and also estimated the variance between the studies (τ2). For exposure-effect analysis between the TyG index and arterial stiffness, we used the robust error meta-regression method [21], which required at least two categories with corresponding effect estimates.

We assessed the heterogeneity across the included articles using Cochrane's Q test (τ2). I2 was used to assess inconsistency among our findings. We performed sensitivity analysis using Stata 16.0 (StataCorp, US) to test the stability of the results. We also analyzed the publication bias for the results with more than 10 eligible articles by funnel plot, Egger’s test, and Begg’s test. A statistically significant effect was considered when the P value was less than 0.05.

Results

Literature search

We conducted a comprehensive literature search following our search strategy, which included searching through PubMed (494 articles), The Cochrane Library (2845 articles), and Embase (54 reports), totaling 3393 reports. After removing duplicates (94 reports), we screened the remaining 32 articles by reading the title and abstract, and assessed six additional articles for lacking target data (n = 6) (Fig. 1) [11, 22,23,24,25,26]. Finally, ten cohort studies[14, 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35] and sixteen cross-sectional [9, 15, 36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49] studies were included in the present research, while the detailed reasons for the excluded articles are listed in Additional file 1: Table S3.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study selection process

Full size image

Study characteristics and quality evaluation

Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the included studies, which were published between 2017 and 2022, with a sample size ranging from 180 to 13,706 and a total of 87,307 participants. Among the included studies, 15 were from China[9, 14, 15, 28, 29, 31, 33, 34, 36, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47, 50], seven were conducted in Korea [27, 30, 34, 35, 37,38,39], three were from [42, 48, 49] Japan [41, 47, 49], and only one originated in non-Asia (United States) [43]. The mean age of participants ranged from 28.7 to 75 years, and the BMI ranged from 22.5 to 28.5 kg/m2. Although the included studies varied in their endpoint measurement methods, arterial stiffness was mostly diagnosed using brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), and arterial calcification was mostly graded using coronary artery calcium score (CACS).

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies in this meta-analysis
Full size table

Additional file 1: Table S4 displays the quality evaluation results, which indicate that the overall quality of the cross-sectional studies was acceptable. However, three studies [15, 41, 43] did not adjust for confounding factors, and five studies[31, 34, 37, 39, 41, 43] did not use objective criteria to classify subgroups. The cohort studies scored between 7 and 8 on the NOS scale (Additional file 1: Table S5).

Association between the TyG index and risk of arterial stiffness

Twelve studies [9, 14, 29, 36, 39, 40, 44,45,46,47,48,49] examined the TyG index as a categorical variable to evaluate the risk of arterial stiffness. The highest TyG group were associated with greater risk of arterial stiffness compared to the lowest TyG group (OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.55–2.17, I2 = 68%, τ2 = 0.05) (Fig. 2A). When the TyG index was treated as a continuous variable [14, 28, 36, 40,41,42,43,44,45, 47, 48], each unit of the TyG index increased the risk of arterial stiffness by 51% (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.35–1.69, I2 = 82%, τ2 = 0.03) (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot of the association between the triglyceride-glucose index (A analyzed as categorical variable; B analyzed as continuous variable) and the risk of arterial stiffness. The black midline indicates the line of no effect. The diamond indicates the pooled estimate. Red boxes are relative to study size, and the black transverse lines indicate the 95% confidence interval around the effect size estimate.

Full size image

Association between the TyG index and risk of CAC

The pooled results showed a higher TyG index is a risk factor for CAC, increasing the risk by 66% when comparing the highest and lowest categories (OR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.51–1.82, I2 = 0, τ2 = 0.00) [15, 37, 38] (Fig. 3A). When the TyG index was treated as a continuous variable [15, 31, 33, 34, 38], a positive association was confirmed (OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.36–2.20, I2 = 51%, τ2 = 0.04) (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

A Forest plot of the association between the triglyceride-glucose index (analyzed as a categorical variable) and the risk of coronary artery calcification. B Forest plot of the association between the triglyceride-glucose index (analyzed as a continuous variable) and the risk of coronary artery calcification. C Forest plot of the association between the triglyceride-glucose index (analyzed as a categorical variable) and the progression of coronary artery calcification. D Forest plot of the association between the triglyceride-glucose index (analyzed as a continuous variable) and the progression of coronary artery calcification. The black midline indicates the line of no effect. The diamond indicates the pooled estimate. Red boxes are relative to study size, and the black transverse lines indicate the 95% confidence interval around the effect size estimate.

Full size image

Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between the TyG index and the progression of CAC among four articles [27, 30, 32, 35]. Consistently, we found that the TyG index was associated with the progression of CAC, whether analyzed as category variables (OR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.21–2.27, I2 = 0, τ2 = 0.00) or continuous variables (OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.29–1.68, I2 = 41%, τ2 = 0.00) (Fig. 3C, D).

Exposure-effect analysis between the TyG index and arterial stiffness

Ten studies [9, 14, 29, 36, 39, 40, 44, 45, 47, 49] were included for the exposure-effect meta-analysis of the TyG index and arterial stiffness. A positive relationship is shown in Fig. 4 with evidence of nonlinearity (Pnonlinearity < 0.001). Interestingly, the exposure-effect curve became less steep at TyG index values of approximately 9. The estimated OR derived from the exposure-effect curve is shown in Additional file 1: Table S6.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Triglyceride-glucose index and risk of arterial stiffness in nonlinear exposure-effect analysis. The solid line and the dashed lines represent the estimated odd ratio and the 95% confidence interval, respectively

Full size image

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

We conducted sensitivity analyses for each outcome separately by deleting each study (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Our results showed that the combined estimated effect of arterial stiffness ranged from 1.64 (95% CI 1.47–1.85) to 1.90 (95% CI 1.59–2.28) when the TyG index was recognized as a categorical variable. When analyzed continuously, the estimated effect ranged from 1.43 (95% CI 1.30–1.57) to 1.55 (95% CI 1.38–1.75), showing that our results are roubst. We also conducted sensitivity analyses of the TyG index with CAC and found stable results.

We assessed publication bias using funnel plots, Egger's test (P = 0.511), and Begg's test (P = 0.631), which indicated relatively low evidence of publication bias (Additional file 1: Fig. S2, S3).

Subgroup analyses

We performed subgroup analyses for the studies that reported the association between the TyG index (analyzed as a continuous variable) and arterial stiffness, according to mean age, type of study design, sample size, mean body mass index (BMI), and adjustment for confounders (Table 2). The combined OR for individuals with a BMI < 24 was 1.97 (95% CI 1.61–2.42), while the result for those with a BMI ≥ 24 was 1.39 (95% CI 1.26–1.53), suggesting that the TyG index was more closely associated with arterial stiffness in the former group. Moreover, in the subgroups adjusted for confounders, the summary OR changed dramatically in the BMI group, with 1.55 (95% CI 1.38–1.75) for those already adjusted for BMI and 1.21 (95% CI 1.11–1.32) for those not adjusted (P < 0.001). Similar results were also shown in the HDL-C group, suggesting a subgroup difference for the adjustment for BMI or HDL-C.

Table 2 Subgroup analysis of TyG and risk of arterial stiffness
Full size table

Discussion

Major findings

Our study found that a higher TyG index was associated with an increased risk of arterial stiffness and CAC, regardless of whether the TyG index was analyzed as a categorical variable or continuous variable. Additionally, the TyG index was associated with the progression of CAC. Our exposure-effect meta-analysis also demonstrated a nonlinear positive association between the TyG index and the risk of arterial stiffness.

Previous studies have investigated the relationship between the TyG index and arterial stiffness and CAC. Guo et al. [28] found that the TyG index is independently associated with increased baPWV, a simple and noninvasive method that correlates well with arterial stiffness, in the general Chinese population. Chen et al. [15] reported that a higher TyG index is associated with an increased risk of widespread abdominal aortic CAC. Our findings are consistent with these studies, but our research provides unique insights into the pathogenesis of both arterial stiffness and CAC, suggesting that IR may play a critical role. Furthermore, our study is the first to demonstrate a nonlinear positive relationship between the TyG index and arterial stiffness.

Cardiovascular risk factors or diseases can also impact the TyG level and may potentially confound the association between TyG index and CAC or stiffness. Then we did subgroup analyses stratified by these adjustments. The results showed that our findings remained reliable, regardless of whether we adjusted for age, gender, smoking, obesity, diabetes, exercise status, and medication status.

Elevated plasma glucose has been identified as a potential risk factor for arterial stiffness. For instance, Wang et al. [50] reported a positive association between increased fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels and the prevalence of arterial stiffness, while Shin et al. [51] showed that even within the normal range, increasing FPG levels were associated with increased risk of arterial stiffness. It is worth nothing that the calculation method of TyG also shows that plasma glucose will affect the measurement of TyG index. Therefore, adjustments for plasma glucose as a confounding factor in the original studies may impact our findings. However, our subgroup analysis revealed that adjustments for diabetes did not significantly affect our results (P-value > 0.05), indicating the credibility of our findings.

Table 2 indicates that the group heterogeneity was small in subgroups adjusted for BMI and HDL-C. For example, I2 was 57% for the group adujusted for HDL-C, while I2 was 32% for the group that not adjusted, which indicates that the adjustment for BMI and HDL-C may be the source of heterogeneity of the results. Further analysis revealed that obesity is a risk factor for arterial stiffness, and HDL-C is also closely related to the onset of arterial stiffness. Wen et al. [52] found that TG/HDL-C was associated with increased arterial stiffness in both male and female (OR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.11–3.30, P < 0.05, and 2.91 95% CI: 1.02–8.30, P < 0.05, respectively). This could explain whether adjusted BMI and HDL-C may be the source of outcome heterogeneity.

In our subgroup analysis, we found an interesting association between the TyG index and artificial stiffness in individuals with a BMI < 24 kg/m2. This is surprising as obesity is generally considered a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and arterial stiffness. However, caution should be exercised in interpreting this result as the subgroup analysis included only three studies, which may limit the accuracy of the findings. It is important to note that several factors can influence the results. For instance, all three studies in the BMI < 24 kg/m2 group were cross-sectional, which may affect the stability of the outcome. Moreover, these studies had adjusted for HDL-C, while some studies in the BMI > 24 kg/m2 group did not. This adjustment may have increased the association between the TyG index and the risk of arterial stiffness, as reflected in our findings. Specifically, studies adjusted for HDL-C showed a summary OR of 1.66 (95% CI 1.48–1.85) compared to 1.25 (95% CI 1.16–1.35) in studies without adjustment, indicating an 11% higher risk for arterial stiffness (P < 0.001). Therefore, it is important to conduct more studies to determine how BMI affects the association between the TyG index and arterial stiffness.

It is worth noting that the majority of the included studies were cross-sectional (16 out of 26), and the observational design of the eligible studies does not allow us to establish causality. As such, it remains unclear whether a higher TyG index is linked to the incidence of arterial stiffness and CAC. Further research is needed to address this gap in knowledge.

Several relevant prospective studies have have shed light on the relationship between the TyG index and arterial stiffness and coronary artery CAC. Wu et al. [14] observed a 58% higher incidence of arterial stiffness among participants with an elevated TyG index (HR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.25–2.01) after adjusting for age, sex, BMI and so on. This longitudinal study involved 6,028 participants who were followed up for 26,839 person-years. Similarly, a study by Won et al. [35] found that the TyG index was strongly associated with the progression of coronary artery CAC in 93,707 asymptomatic Korean adults over a 3.3-year follow-up period. The highest TyG index group had a 37.5% incidence of CAC progression compared to 22.7% in the lowest TyG index group, even after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. These findings suggest a significant link between the TyG index and the incidence of arterial stiffness and CAC.

Mechanism

Arterial stiffness (arteriosclerosis) and coronary artery calcification (CAC) are two distinct concepts, although they are often associated with each other. According to Mitchell et al. [53], atherosclerosis is a patchy intimal abnormality that is most likely the result of arteriosclerosis, which caused by the increased production of hard load-bearing elements in the arterial wall. Therefore, it is important not to confused these two concepts. However, some of the mechanisms underlying the association between the TyG index and arterial stiffness and CAC are overlapping, and we focus on these common mechanisms (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Cartoon describing the potential mechanism of the association between the triglyceride-glucose index and arterial stiffness and coronary artery calcification

Full size image

One of the main factors that contribute to both arterial stiffness and CAC is IR, which is often accompanied by hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia. These metabolic disturbances have been widely recognized as risk factors for arterial stiffness and CAC [54,55,56]. Hyperinsulinemia can lead to oxidative stress and impaired endothelial cell function, which in turn reduces the bioavailability of nitric oxide [57], causing functional and structural damage to blood vessels, such as reducing the distensibility of the arterial wall (leading to arterial stiffness) [58]. It can also induce osteogenic differentiation and CAC of vascular cells [59]. Moreover, IR can accelerate the accumulation of advanced glycosylation end-products (AGE), which further promote arterial stiffness and CAC [60] Therefore, IR may play a crucial role in the development of arterial stiffness and CAC, which can help explain the association between the TyG index and these cardiovascular outcomes.

Clinical implication

Currently, the predictive ability of the commonly used clinical index for arterial stiffness and CAC, CACS, remains underwhelming. While CACS measures the calcium content in the coronary artery by CT scan, it does not use all the calcium density information, leading to many patients receiving a zero score [61]. However, studies have reported the TyG index as a surrogate marker of IR and its predictive role in many cardiovascular diseases [62, 63]. Therefore, it may improve the predictive efficiency of arterial stiffness and CAC. Since the TyG index can be obtained simply by regular blood tests, it could serve as an alternative indicator for the occurrence and progression of arterial stiffness and CAC in the future. The diagnostic performance of the TyG index for predicting high baPWV was analyzed by Guo et al. [28], who reported an area under the curve of 0.580 (95% CI 0.565–0.595). The simplicity of its detection suggests that the TyG index might serve as a diagnostic method for arterial stiffness clinically. Moreover, the best cut value for the TyG index was 8.55, which is consistent with the result of the study by Lee et al. [39], showing a positive linear association between the highest quantile of the TyG index (> 8.57) and baPWV. Our exposure-effect analysis found that the positive association between TyG and arterial stiffness increased sharply when the TyG index was approximately 9, and after that, the growth rate of the curve slowed down, implying that approximately 8.6 may be the optimal cut-off point for the TyG index to predict the occurrence of arterial stiffness. Thus, the TyG index may have significant clinical prospects for the diagnosis and prediction of arterial stiffness and CAC, but more research and exploration are needed in the future.

Limitations

Our results presents the first analysis of the exposure-effect relationship between the TyG index and arterial stiffness and the first exploration of the association between the TyG index and CAC. However, we must acknowledge some limitations. Firstly, the majority of eligible studies were conducted in Asia, which may limit the generalizability of our findings to other populations. Secondly, previous research has demonstrated a direct relationship between the TyG index and other metabolic factors, such as obesity, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes [42, 64]. For instance, studies have confirmed that the TyG index can be independently predict adverse cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes [65], and and our previous research suggests a significant relationship between a high TyG index and the incidence of cardiovascular disease in the general population [8]. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether there is an interaction between diabetes and the association between TyG and arterial stiffness and CAC. Furthermore, although bapwv is a commonly used measure of arterial stiffness in clinical practice, it is a non-specific indicator and cannot be used as an alternative to assessing arterial stiffness. Therefore, further studies are needed to confirm our results.

Conclusion

Our study showed that the TyG index is associated with an increased risk of arterial stiffness and CAC. Moreover, we observed a positive relationship between the TyG index and arterial stiffness with a nonlinear shape. Nevertheless, we should consider that the results may be influenced by the cross-sectional design and potential confounding factors. Therefore, further investigations are necessary to evaluate the potential of the TyG index as a predictor for arterial stiffness and CAC in addition to existing risk scores.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its Additional files].

Abbreviations

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

CAC:

Coronary artery calcification

TyG index:

Triglyceride and glucose index

IR:

Insulin resistance

HOMA-IR:

Homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance

BMI:

Body mass index

HR:

Hazard ratio

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

NOS:

Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale

CACS:

Coronary artery calcium score

baPWV:

Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity

References

  1. Kivimäki M, Steptoe A. Effects of stress on the development and progression of cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(4):215–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tesauro M, et al. Arterial ageing: from endothelial dysfunction to vascular calcification. J Intern Med. 2017;281(5):471–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mori H, et al. Coronary artery calcification and its progression: what does it really mean? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(1):127–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Palombo C, Kozakova M. Arterial stiffness, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk: pathophysiologic mechanisms and emerging clinical indications. Vascul Pharmacol. 2016;77:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van den Bergh G, et al. The vicious cycle of arterial stiffness and arterial media calcification. Trends Mol Med. 2019;25(12):1133–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guerrero-Romero F, et al. The product of triglycerides and glucose, a simple measure of insulin sensitivity. Comparison with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(7):3347–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JK. Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp to assess insulin sensitivity in vivo. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ). 2009;560:221–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu X, et al. Relationship between the triglyceride-glucose index and risk of cardiovascular diseases and mortality in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao S, et al. Association between macro- and microvascular damage and the triglyceride glucose index in community-dwelling elderly individuals: the Northern Shanghai Study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Li H, et al. Triglyceride-glucose index variability and incident cardiovascular disease: a prospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Baydar O, et al. The triglyceride-glucose index, a predictor of insulin resistance, is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis. Angiology. 2021;72(10):994–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yokoyama H, et al. Prognostic impact of body mass index and culprit lesion calcification in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Heart Vessels. 2019;34(12):1909–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Y, et al. Arterial stiffness and stroke: de-stiffening strategy, a therapeutic target for stroke. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(2):65–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu S, et al. Association between triglyceride-glucose index and risk of arterial stiffness: a cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen Y, et al. Association between the triglyceride-glucose index and abdominal aortic calcification in adults: a cross-sectional study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;31(7):2068–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Page MJ, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2021;372: n71.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lo CK-L, Mertz D, Loeb M. Newcastle–Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Moola S, et al. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): the Joanna Briggs Institute’s approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):163–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Simental-Mendía LE, Rodríguez-Morán M, Guerrero-Romero F. The product of fasting glucose and triglycerides as surrogate for identifying insulin resistance in apparently healthy subjects. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2008;6(4):299–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenland S, Longnecker MP. Methods for trend estimation from summarized exposure-effect data, with applications to meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135(11):1301–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu C, et al. The methodological quality of exposure-effect meta-analyses needed substantial improvement: a cross-sectional survey and proposed recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;107:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chiu T-H, et al. A high triglyceride-glucose index is associated with left ventricular dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Int J Med Sci. 2021;18(4):1051–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lambrinoudaki I, et al. The TyG index as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in lean and overweight postmenopausal women. Heart Lung Circ. 2018;27(6):716–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehta R, et al. Association between insulin resistance and arterial stiffness in Mexican patients without type 2 diabetes. Gac Med Mex. 2021;157(5):522–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Won KB, et al. Relationship of insulin resistance estimated by triglyceride glucose index to arterial stiffness. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17(1):268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu Z, et al. Association of TyG index and TG/HDL-C ratio with arterial stiffness progression in a non-normotensive population. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cho YK, et al. Triglyceride glucose-waist circumference better predicts coronary calcium progression compared with other indices of insulin resistance: a longitudinal observational study. J Clin Med. 2020;10(1):92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Guo W, et al. Triglyceride glucose index is associated with arterial stiffness and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in a Chinese population. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8: 585776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Han Z, et al. Glycated hemoglobin and risk of arterial stiffness in a chinese han population: a longitudinal study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13: 854875.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Park K, et al. Elevated TyG index predicts progression of coronary artery calcification. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(8):1569–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Si Y, et al. Atherogenic index of plasma, triglyceride-glucose index and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting subclinical coronary artery disease. Am J Med Sci. 2021;362(3):285–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Song S, et al. Incremental prognostic value of triglyceride glucose index additional to coronary artery calcium score in asymptomatic low-risk population. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang J, et al. Association between triglyceride glucose index, coronary artery calcification and multivessel coronary disease in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Won KB, et al. The relationship of insulin resistance estimated by triglyceride glucose index and coronary plaque characteristics. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(21): e10726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Won K-B, et al. Triglyceride glucose index is an independent predictor for the progression of coronary artery calcification in the absence of heavy coronary artery calcification at baseline. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ji W, et al. Association of the triglyceride-glucose index and vascular target organ damage in a Beijing community-based population. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9: 948402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim J-H, et al. Triglyceride glucose index predicts coronary artery calcification better than other indices of insulin resistance in Korean adults: the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study. Precis Future Med. 2017;1(1):43–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim MK, et al. Relationship between the triglyceride glucose index and coronary artery calcification in Korean adults. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16(1):108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee SB, et al. Association between triglyceride glucose index and arterial stiffness in Korean adults. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Li M, et al. Positive association between triglyceride glucose index and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients: the China H-type Hypertension Registry Study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Nakagomi A, et al. Sex difference in the association between surrogate markers of insulin resistance and arterial stiffness. J Diabetes Complicat. 2020;34(6): 107442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pan Y, et al. Association between diabetes complications and the triglyceride-glucose index in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Res. 2021;2021:8757996.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Poon AK, et al. Association of insulin resistance, from mid-life to late-life, with aortic stiffness in late-life: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Su Y, et al. Triglyceride glucose index associated with arterial stiffness in chinese community-dwelling elderly. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8: 737899.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang S, et al. Stronger association of triglyceride glucose index than the HOMA-IR with arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes: a real-world single-centre study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Yan Y, et al. Triglyceride-glucose index trajectory and arterial stiffness: results from Hanzhong Adolescent Hypertension Cohort Study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang X, et al. The correlation of atherosclerosis and triglyceride glucose index: a secondary analysis of a national cross-sectional study of Japanese. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22(1):250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang CR. Association between triglyceride glucose index and arterial stiffness in the Japanese population: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional study. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2022; 44(2).

  49. Zhang X, et al. Correlation between non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices and increased arterial stiffness measured by the cardio-ankle vascular index in non-hypertensive Chinese subjects: a cross-sectional study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9: 903307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang J, et al. Increased fasting glucose and the prevalence of arterial stiffness: a cross-sectional study in Chinese adults. Neurol Res. 2014;36(5):427–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Shin JY, Lee HR, Lee DC. Increased arterial stiffness in healthy subjects with high-normal glucose levels and in subjects with pre-diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011;10:30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Wen J-H, et al. Triglyceride to HDL-C ratio and increased arterial stiffness in apparently healthy individuals. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(3):4342–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Mitchell GF, Powell JT. Arteriosclerosis: a primer for “in focus” reviews on arterial stiffness. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40(5):1025–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Markus MRP, et al. Glucose and insulin levels are associated with arterial stiffness and concentric remodeling of the heart. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Murkamilov IT, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and arterial wall stiffness: new targets in diabetic nephropathy. Ter Arkh. 2017;89(10):87–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hill MA, et al. Insulin resistance, cardiovascular stiffening and cardiovascular disease. Metab Clin Exp. 2021;119:154766.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Jia G, et al. Vascular stiffness in insulin resistance and obesity. Front Physiol. 2015;6:231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Adeva-Andany MM, et al. Insulin resistance is associated with subclinical vascular disease in humans. World J Diabetes. 2019;10(2):63–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Chen Y, Zhao X, Wu H. Arterial stiffness: a focus on vascular calcification and its link to bone mineralization. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40(5):1078–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Llauradó G, et al. Advanced glycation end products are associated with arterial stiffness in type 1 diabetes. J Endocrinol. 2014;221(3):405–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Shea S, et al. Spatially weighted coronary artery calcium score and coronary heart disease events in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(1): e011981.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhao Q, et al. Triglyceride-glucose index as a surrogate marker of insulin resistance for predicting cardiovascular outcomes in nondiabetic patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2021;28(11):1175–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sánchez-Íñigo L, et al. The TyG index may predict the development of cardiovascular events. Eur J Clin Invest. 2016;46(2):189–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang Y, Yang W, Jiang X. Association between triglyceride-glucose index and hypertension: a meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8: 644035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Wang L, et al. Triglyceride-glucose index predicts adverse cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Peng Yu, 81760050, 81760048), the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Youth Scientific Research (Peng Yu, 20192ACBL21037) and Basic Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Liaoning Province (Grant LQN2017ST03).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Qin Ling

    Present address: Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China

  2. Fuwei Liu, Qin Ling and Shaofeng Xie: Co-first authors; Fuwei Liu, Shaofeng Xie and Jun Luo: Co-corresponding authors

  3. Wengen Zhu and Xiao Liu: Senior authors

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China

    Fuwei Liu, Shaofeng Xie & Jun Luo

  2. The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China

    Qin Ling, Yi Xu & Qingwen Hu

  3. Department of Cardiology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    Menglu Liu & Yujie Zhao

  4. Department of Pharmacology and Systems Physiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA

    Jianyong Ma

  5. Department of Sports Rehabilitation, College of Human Kinesiology, Shenyang Sport University, Shenyang, China

    Zhiwei Yan & Yan Gao

  6. Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

    Wengen Zhu

  7. Department of Endocrine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

    Peng Yu

  8. Department of Cardiology, The Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

    Xiao Liu

  9. Provincial University Key Laboratory of Sport and Health Science, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

    Zhiwei Yan

Authors
  1. Fuwei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qin Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shaofeng Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Menglu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qingwen Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jianyong Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhiwei Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yan Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yujie Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Wengen Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Peng Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jun Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Xiao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JL, FL and PY was responsible for the entire project and revised the draft. QL, SX and FL performed the study selection, data extraction, statistical analysis, and interpretation of the data. QL and XL drafted the first manuscript version. All authors participated in the interpretation of the results and prepared the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Luo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Table S1. PRISMA Checklist. Table S2. Search strategy. Table S3. Studies excludedwith reasons. Table S4. Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist applied for included studies. Table S5. Quality assessment of the included studies by Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Table S6. Odds ratio from the linear dose-response analysis. Figure S1. Sensitivity analysis of the association between triglyceride-glucose index and the risk of arterial stiffnessand coronary artery calcification. Figure S2. Publication bias detected by funnel plot, Egger’s test and Begg’s test for the association between TyGand the risk of arterial stiffness. Figure S3. Publication bias detected by funnel plot, Egger’s test and Begg’s test for the association between TyGand the risk of coronary artery calcification..

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, F., Ling, Q., Xie, S. et al. Association between triglyceride glucose index and arterial stiffness and coronary artery calcification: a systematic review and exposure-effect meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol 22, 111 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01819-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01819-2

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diabetology

ISSN: 1475-2840