Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Clinical significance of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and sdLDL-C for coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged ≥ 65 years

Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 21, Article number: 252 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background and aims

Although type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) share many common pathological and physiological characteristics, there are few studies assessing the predictive capacity of novel biomarkers in occurrence and development of CAD in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years. In addition, T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years are prone to CAD. Therefore, it is of great significance to find novel biomarkers for the development CAD in T2DM.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, 579 T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years were consecutively enrolled in this work, and 177 of whom had major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: cardiovascular or cerebrovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, coronary stent implantation, and stroke) during the follow up. Univariate and multivariate factors were employed to analyze the correlation between each variable and the occurrence of MACCE, and the Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationships between Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (sdLDL-C). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was adopted to determine the predictive value of NGAL and sdLDL-C elevation for MACCE in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years.

Results

After a median 48 months follow-up [19, (10 ~ 32) ], the levels of NGAL, sdLDL-C, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), LDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) were significantly higher while those of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A I (ApoA–I) were lower in MACCE positive group. NGAL correlated to body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.391, P = 0.001) and triglyceride (TG) (r = 0.228, P = 0.032), and high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) (r = 0.251, P = 0.007), and neutrophils (r = 0.454, P = 0.001), sdlDL–C level was found to be positively correlated with LDL-C (r = 0.413, P = 0.001), TG (r = 0.432, P = 0.001), and ApoB (r = 0.232, P = 0.002); and it was negatively correlated with HDL-C (r = -0.362, P = 0.031) and ApoA–I (r = -0.402, P = 0.001). Age-adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that NGAL (HR = 1.006, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005–1.008, P < 0.001) and sdLDL–C (HR = 1.052, 95% CI: 1.037–1.066, P < 0.001) were independently associated with occurrence of MACCE. ROC curve analysis showed that NGAL (area under ROC (AUC) = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75–0.84, P < 0.001) and sdlDL–C (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72–0.80, P < 0.001) could predict the occurrence of MACCE (area under ROC. NGAL combined with sdlDL–C could predict the occurrence of MACCE well (AUC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84–0.90, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The higher NGAL and sdLDL-C in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years were significantly and independently associated with the risk of MACCE, and showed higher clinical values than other lipid biomarkers or other chronic inflammation, so they were expected to be the most effective predictors of MACCE assessment.

Introduction

The extensive prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major health problem with high mortality and morbidity worldwide [1, 2]. Currently, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects the health and living conditions of hundreds of million people, with a global prevalence of roughly 9.3% [3]. Development of T2DM is attributed to many factors such as insulin resistance and high levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), which are also the risk factors of CAD. In addition, studies have shown that T2DM patients have a 2–3 times higher risk of CAD than healthy people, and 84% of them over 65 years old die from heart disease or stroke [4,5,6].

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a 25 kD protein secreted by the activated neutrophils, adipocytes, macrophages, and other specific tissues such as prostate gland, small intestine, bronchus, pancreas, kidney, and thymus [7]. Elevated NGAL level is noticed in adipocytes when metabolic and inflammatory disorders are found [8]. NGAL is the most potential marker of acute renal injury by the Working Group of the 10th Consensus Working Meeting of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) [9]. Recent data have shown that NGAL complexes with matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) exert structural effect, perturbing the normal physiological functions and contributing to fibrosis [10]. In addition, NGAL can be detected in atherosclerosis plaques, damaged myocardium, and arterial plaques [11, 12]. In recent years, NGAL level is proved to be related to the glucose metabolism and blood lipid composition [13], but whether it is associated with major CAD in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years needs further proof.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL–C) is a known risk factor for CAD and is the most important target for reducing the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk. However, the probability of predicting the risk of CAD based on a single elevated LDL-C level is about 50% [14]. LDL–C consists mainly of large and buoyant particles (lbLDL-C diameter: 20.6–22 nm), and small and dense particles (sdLDL-C diameter: 19.0–20.5 nm) [15]. sdlDL-C penetrates more through artery walls, shows a lower affinity for LDL receptors and a longer half-life in the blood, and is more easily oxidized, so it is more likely to cause arteriosclerosis [16, 17]. The sdlDL-C level is higher in the serum of CAD patients, and it is easy to susceptible to chemical modification that increases its atherogenicity [18, 19]. The National Cholesterol Education Program recognized sdLDL-C as an emerging risk factor in 2002 due to its association with CAD [20]. However, taking sdLDL-C as an independent risk factor of CAD in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years is still not fully matured [21, 22].

This work aimed to investigate the association between NGAL and sdlDL-C levels and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: cardiovascular or cerebrovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, coronary stent implantation, and stroke) in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years, to evaluate the predictive value of NGAL and sdlDL-C for MACCE in these patients, and to determine whether they are more suitable than other lipid biomarkers such as LDL-C.

Methods

Study subjects

We performed a retrospective cohort study that was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xuzhou Central Hospital [XZXY-LJ-2016-119-070] and written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Two-sided intervals and 95% confidence were required. Individuals with T2DM were consecutively recruited from Xuzhou Central Hospital No.199, Jiefang South Road, Xuzhou 221,009, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China from January 2017 to July 2021. Exclusion criteria included the cardio-cerebrovascular history, severe kidney and liver disease(creatinine > 2 mg/dl or ALT > 2 times upper normal limit, respectively), acute or chronic infectious disease, malignant tumor, and thyroid disease of the included subjects, and any kind of auto-immune disease, and patients with benign prostate hyperplasia or chronic respiratory disease such as asthma and COPD were also ruled out. The T2DM was diagnosed based on the international criteria 2010 issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) [23]. Dyslipidemia was defined as follows: triglyceride (TG) ≥ 150 (mg/dl), LDL-C ≥ 130 (mg/dl) or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) < 40 (mg/dl) [24]. The diagnostic criteria of hypertension were defined as follows: systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmhg (1 mmhg = 0.133 kPa) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmhg, and it should be measured 3 times to calculate the average value, or taking anti-hypertensive drugs [25]. Body mass index ( BMI ) was defined as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters ( kg/m2 ). Oral hypoglycemic agents included insulin, other AHAs, metformin, sulfonylurea, thiazolidinedione, glinides, glitazones, α-glucosidase inhibitor and DDP-4i. All the selected individuals were reviewed in September and December 2021. The end point of this work was the first occurrence of MACCE, death, or last visit to Xuzhou Central Hospital during the follow-up period.

Data extraction and collection

Individuals with T2DM were consecutively recruited from the Department of Clinical Laboratory, Endocrine Department and Cardiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, No.199, Jiefang South Road, Xuzhou 221,009, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China. The data included patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics, age, sex, ethnicity, body measurements, hypertension, medical history, and previous medications, blood content (i.e., FPG, HbA1c, Insulin, plasma TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, sdlDL-C, ApoA–I, ApoB, Lp (a), hsCRP, Neutrophils, Scr, UA, NGAL), etc.

The primary outcome study was the occurrence of MACCE (major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events), including cardiovascular or cerebrovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, coronary stent implantation, and stroke. The participants were followed up every 2–4 months by phone interviews or visits at the outpatient clinic. Relevant medical information was collected during each follow-up. Follow-up data on clinical outcomes were also collected by trained independent investigators through telephonic or in-person interviews with the study participants. All patients had a total of 48 months of post-trial observation[19, (10 ~ 32) ].

Clinical and laboratory measurements

All participants underwent a complete medical history and a comprehensive physical examination such as height, weight and blood pressure. 10-mL fasting peripheral blood was collected from each subject and centrifuged for 5 min at 3,000. After that, the serum was immediately frozen at -80 °C until testing. Serum glucose (GLU), creatinine (Scr), uric acid (UA), and lipid profiles, including total cholesterol (TC), TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), lipoprotein(a) (Lpa), and sdlDL-C were measured by standard enzymatic procedures on an automated chemical analyzer (7600-020; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Glycated HbA1c concentration was measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (Bio-Rad Inc, Hercules, CA, USA). High-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) level was tested by particle enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (Hitachi 917 analyzer: Boehringer Mannheim, Germany). In addition, the NGAL concentration was determined by chemiluminescence immunoassay kit (CLIA MQ60 plus; Hotgen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing). The Department of Clinical Laboratory of hospital implements internal and external quality control procedures.

Statistical analysis

R Studio (embedded R3.6.3) was used for data analysis of this study. Variables with normal distribution are presented as mean ± standard deviation and variables with skewed distribution are expressed as median with inter-quartile range(IQR). Student’s t-test (for normally distributed variables) and Wilcoxon rank-sum test (for skewed variables) were used to assess the significance of differences. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies with percentages and compared via the Pearson chi-square test. The Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated to show the associations between NGAL or sdlDL-C with other variables; after using LASSO dimension reduction regression, potential influencing factors were screened, and collinearity among variables was removed. A multivariate COX Regression analysis was performed with study outcome and follow-up time as dependent variables, and HR was used as a risk assessment parameter, using VIF to revalidate collinearity between variables, and then using internal validation to test the robustness of regression models, using the Bootstrap sampling method, the calibration curve was drawn by repeated sampling 1000 times. A two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 meant a statistically significant difference, this test was bilateral.

Results

Baseline characteristics

In our study, 601 patients were included in the full analysis set. During the follow-up, there were 8 missing data, 3 missing samples, and 11 missing patients, but they showed no influence on the statistical results. Finally, 579 T2DM patients were enrolled in this work, including 369 males (63.7%) and 210 females (36.3%). All subjects were diagnosed with T2DM and the longest follow-up period was 48 months[19, (10 ~ 32) ]. During the follow-up period, there were 15 cases with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular death, 76 cases with acute coronary syndrome, 69 cases with coronary stent implantation, and 17 cases with stroke. The patients were divided into a positive group and a negative group according to whether the predefined MACCE occurred during follow-up. Compared with MACCE negative group, the proportion of anti-hypertensive therapy (P = 0.029), lipid-lowering therapy (P = 0.028), the levels of NGAL (P = 0.000), sdlDL-C (P = 0.000), HbA1c (P = 0.001), LDL-C (P = 0.000), ApoB (P = 0.002) in the positive group were significantly higher; and ApoA–I (P = 0.002) levels were lower. No significant differences were found in age (P = 0.907), gender (P = 0.653), body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.988), smoking or not (P = 0.886), hypertension (P = 0.757), dyslipidemia (P = 0.892), SBP (P = 0.055), DBP (P = 0.572), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (P = 0.304), insulin (P = 0.513), TG (P = 0.728), TC (P = 0.959), HDL-C (P = 0.782), Lp(a) (P = 0.183), hsCRP (P = 0.970), neutrophils (P = 0.206), Scr (P = 0.931), and UA (P = 0.938) between two groups (Table 1). In this study, oral hypoglycemic agents included insulin (P = 0.131), other AHAs (P = 0.7866), metformin (P = 0.477), sulfonylurea (P = 0.619), thiazolidinedione (P = 0.852), glinides (P = 0.481), glitazones (P = 0.729), α-glucosidase inhibitor (P = 0.934), DDP-4i (P = 0.757), we have made a corresponding analysis on the use of these drugs and their impact on NGAL and sdlLDL, and outcomes of interest. Unfortunately, these drugs have no impact on NGAL and sdlLDL and their corresponding results (P > 0.05 respectively). In general, the baseline characteristics were well-matched between the two groups.

Table 1 Clinical, biochemical, and angiographic characteristics of study subjects in different groups
Full size table

Correlations of NGAL and sdlDL-C

Correlations of NGAL and sdlDL-C with other variables were searched across the whole study by Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. It was found that the NGAL was significantly positively correlated with BMI (r = 0.391, p = 0.001), TG (r = 0.228, p = 0.032), hsCRP (r = 0.251, p = 0.007), and neutrophils (r = 0.454, p = 0.001). On the other hand, sdlDL–C level was positively correlated with LDL-C (r = 0.413, p = 0.001), TG (r = 0.432, p = 0.001), and ApoB (r = 0.232, p = 0.002), and negatively correlated with HDL-C (r = -0.362, p = 0.031) and ApoA–I (r = -0.402, p = 0.001). The specific results were given in Table 2.

Table 2 Relationship between serum NGAL and sdlDL-C levels and other variables
Full size table

A total of 25 independent variables were included. As the correlation coefficient analysis among independent variables was conducted before, it was found that there was a certain correlation between different independent variables, so the dimension was reduced, the most representative high-risk predictors were screened, and LASSO regression analysis was conducted for all independent variables. With penalty coefficient λ, the coefficients of the independent variables initially included in the model are gradually compressed, and the last part of the independent variable coefficients are compressed to 0, avoiding over fitting of the model. Using 10 times cross validation of minimum criterion to identify the optimal penalty coefficient in LASSO regression model λ, When λ value continues to increase to 1 standard error, The λ is the optimal value of the model, and the final independent variables were ApoA-i, APOB, HbA1c, NGAL, sdLDL-c (Fig. S1A, B).

Next, MACCE and follow-up time were the dependent variables, while age, BMI, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, SBP, DBP, FPG, HbA1c, insulin, TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, sdIDL-C, ApoA-I, ApoB, Lp(a), hsCRP, neutrophils, Scr, UA, and NGAL were set as independent variables. The results showed that high levels of HbA1c (HR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.006–1.228, P = 0.038), sdIDL-C (HR = 1.052, 95% CI: 1.037–1.066, P < 0.001), NGAL (HR = 1.006, 95% CI: 1.005–1.008, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for MACCE in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis results of factors independently associated with the occurrence of MACCE of elder T2DM patients (HR, 95% CI)
Full size table

We re-validate the robustness of the model, that was the internal validation, the calibration curves of the Cox model were drawn. The results showed that the predicted probability curve of the model fitted well with the reference probability, suggesting that the model had high accuracy(Fig S2).

Predictive value of NGAL and sdlDL-C

ROC curve analysis showed that both NGAL (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75–0.84, P < 0.001) and sdlDL-C (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72–0.80, P < 0.001) could predict the occurrence of MACCE in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years. Moreover, the combination of NGAL and sdlDL-C improved the prediction capability (AUC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84–0.90, P < 0.001). The NGAL level of 131.9 ug/L and sdlDL-C level of 32.35 mg/dl were determined as the best cut-off points to predict the risk of MACCE of T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years, with a sensitivity of 74.01% and 69.49% and a specificity of 78.86% and 73.38%, respectively (Fig. 1; Table 4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis on the predictive capacity of the created multivariable Cox regression model for the occurrence of CAD in patients with T2DM aged ≥ 65 years. ROC analysis on the predictive capacity of the NGAL (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75–0.84, P < 0.001) and sdlDL-C (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72–0.80, P < 0.001) for the identification of the hazard for the primary composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE: cardiovascular or cerebrovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, coronary stent implantation, and stroke), with a sensitivity of 74.01% and 69.49% and a specificity of 78.86% and 73.38%, respectively. Moreover, the combination of NGAL and sdlDL-C improved the prediction capability (AUC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84–0.90, P < 0.001)

Full size image
Table 4 ROC analysis on the predictive capacity of NGAL and sdlDL-C for the occurrence of MACCE in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years
Full size table

Discussion

This work demonstrated that compared with MACCE negative group in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years, the patients in positive group showed the higher levels of NGAL and sdlDL-C, which were associated with some other auxiliary diagnostic and therapeutic indicators such as BMI, TG, hsCRP, neutrophils, LDL-c, TG, ApoB, and ApoA-I. Moreover, it was identified in this work that advanced levels of NGAL and sdlDL-C could significantly predict the occurrence of MACCE in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years.

CAD and T2DM share several many common pathological and physiological characteristics. Typical cardiovascular risk factors such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, and obesity increase the risk of T2DM, and dyslipidemia is the main link between T2DM and elevated risk of CAD [26, 27]. In this work, univariate analysis showed that the higher LDL-C, HbA1c, and ApoB and lower ApoA-I and HDL-C were significantly associated with an increased CAD risk of elderly T2DM patients, suggesting that dyslipidemia and inflammatory disorders were important risk factors of CAD. Such result is consistent with that of the previous studies [8, 13].

During the development of CAD, the CRP level is elevated in addition to chronic inflammation, which is a well-established feature [28, 29], and it is positively associated with serum NGAL level even after adjustment for several confounders [30]. In this work, the number of neutrophils was found to be positively correlated with NGAL level. Similar results were obtained in the current study, suggesting that NGAL might promote the inflammatory processes leading to atherosclerosis and even MACCE. Some studies exploring the pathogenic molecular mechanisms of NGAL in atherosclerosis and CAD have shown that the NGAL/MMP-9 complexes destabilize the artery plaque, which could be detected in lipid centers and on the side facing the lumen area detected in clinical plaques. It suggests that NGAL/MMP-9 complexes are involved in vascular inflammation and reconstruction in atherosclerosis and MACCE [31].

sdlDL-C is well known to cause arteriosclerosis, which may be because that the sdLDL-C is small and deposited in the lining of the arteries and bound to glycoproteins. In addition, sdLDL-C is not easy to be cleared due to low affinity with LDL-C receptor, so it is easy to be oxidized and modified, which stimulates the macrophages to absorb lipid, forming foam cells [32]. A study has showed that the sdLDL-C level is significantly associated with the severity of CAD [33]. To the best of our knowledge, this work was the first study to evaluate the association between sdLDL-C level and the risk of MACCE in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years. In addition, this work proved that the combination of sdLDL-C and NGAL could effectively predict the MACCE in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years.

In this work, the multivariate analysis suggested that in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years, increased levels of NGAL and sdLDL-C were significantly associated with occurrence of MACCE. In addition, NGAL was closely correlated with BMI, TG, hsCRP, and neutrophils; and sdlDL-C level was positively correlated with LDL-c, TG, and ApoB, and negatively correlated with HDL-C and ApoA–I. Wang Y [8] confirmed that NGAL was positively correlated with gender and BMI, but not with TG, hsCRP, and neutrophils. Although NGAL is positively correlated with TG, hsCRP, and neutrophils, no established causality has been proven [34]. This work exhibited that sdLDL-C was related to MACCE lipid markers such as LDL-c, TG, and ApoB positively and to HDL-C and ApoA–I negatively. A study that comprised of 59 men with T2DM or high blood glucose has proved that the higher level of sdLDL-C was associated with body weight, age, insulin resistance, and increased intima-media thickness [35]. The sdLDL-C concentration may be a challenge risk factor in healthy people. Regardless of typical lipid tests such as TC, TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C, higher level of sdLDL-C has been detected among men and older individuals, leading to an association with greater mean carotid artery thickness [36]. Recently, some studies have found that the arterial stiffness progression in normotensive subjects could be predicted independently based on the sdLDL-C concentration. Normotensive participants with high quantiles of sdLDL-C were more likely to develop progressive arterial stiffness than those with low quantiles [37].

The results of this work suggested that elevated NGAL and sdLDL-C were significantly associated with MACCE in T2DM patients ≥ 65 years. When both NGAL and sdLDL-C were included in the multiple regression model, NGAL (HR = 1.008, 95% CI: 1.006–1.009, P < 0.001) and sdLDL-C (HR = 1.059, 95% CI: 1.046–1.072, P < 0.001) were independently associated with the risk of MACCE in T2DM patients, which was largely consistent with the above results. In addition, the ROC curve analysis showed that NGAL could predict the occurrence of MACCE in T2DM patients ≥ 65 years accurately (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75–0.84, P < 0.001); sdlDL-C could be a strong predictor of MACCE in T2DM patients ≥ 65 years (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72–0.80, P < 0.001); and the joint detection and prediction ability of the two was improved greatly (AUC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84–0.90, P < 0.001). 131.9 ug/L and 32.35 mg/dl were determined as the best cut-off points of NGAL and sdlDL-C to predict the risk of MACCE of T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years, with sensitivity of 74.01% and 69.49% and specificity of 78.86% and 73.38%, respectively. The findings in this work could affect the featuring lipid or chronic inflammation biomarkers profiling as a useful tool in routine clinical practice in T2DM patients at high risk of CAD. Validation of novel biomarkers, offering additional prognostic value to traditional clinical and laboratory parameters, could aid clinicians in further risk-stratification in T2DM patients. This could facilitate the creation of personalized predictive algorithms, thereby expanding the concept of cardiovascular precision medicine in every-day practice.

Limitations

This work should be explained in the context of its limitations and shortcomings. Firstly, the sample size was relatively small, and the anthropometric measures which were important indexes of CAD, obesity, and T2DM, such as waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio, were not obtained. Secondly, to date it was not clear whether the elevated NGAL and sdLDL-C were associated with ischemic heart failure; and the efficacy of lipid-lowering, anti-diabetic, and anti-hypertensive therapy medications were not documented. Therefore, it was not possible to investigate their impacts on NGAL and sdLDL-C levels. Thirdly, it failed to search for the association between oxidative stress and higher levels NGAL and sdLDL-C during the development of MACCE of T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years. Finally, the data used for analysis in this work derived from Chinese people with suspected or confirmed MACCE and T2DM, and hence the conclusions needed to be validated in larger clinical trials by including other European ethnicities or races to account for inherent variability of different patient populations.

Conclusion

This work was the first one to prove that serum NGAL and sdLDL-C levels were higher in MACCE in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years, and the higher levels NGAL and sdLDL-C were strongly associated with some other lipid and chronic inflammation biomarkers such as LDL-C or neutrophils. After a median of 4 years of follow-up, NGAL and sdLDL-C levels were proved to be more effective predictors for risk of MACCE in T2DM patients aged ≥ 65 years.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

MACCE:

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

IQR:

Interquartile range

N:

Number of patients

BMI:

Body mass index

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

FPG:

Fasting plasma glucose

HbA1c:

Glycated hemoglobin A1c

TG:

Triglyceride

TC:

Total cholesterol

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein-C

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein

sdlDL-C:

Small low-density lipoprotein

ApoA–I:

Apolipoprotein A–I

ApoB:

Apolipoprotein B

Lp(a):

Lipoprotein a

hsCRP:

High-sensitivity CRP

neutrophils:

Number of neutrophils

Scr:

Serum creatinine

UA:

Uric acid

NGAL:

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin

AHAs:

Antihyperglycemic agents

DPP-4i:

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

95% CI :

95% confidence interval

SE:

Std. Error

AUC:

Area under the curve.

References

  1. Ravnskov U, Okuyama H, Sultan S, et al. Long-term association of low–density lipoprotein cholesterol with cardiovascular mortality in individuals at low 10–year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: results from the cooper center longitudinal study. Circulation. 2019;139(18):2188–2189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roth GA, Forouzanfar MH, Moran AE, et al. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1333–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitchell S, Malanda B, Damasceno A, et al. A Roadmap on the prevention of cardiovascular disease among people living with diabetes. Glob Heart. 2019;14(3):215–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sattar N. Revisiting the links between glycaemia, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Diabetologia. 2013;56(4):686–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang B, Yuan S, Xiong Y, et al. Major depressive disorder and cardiometabolic diseases: a bidirectional Mendelian randomisation study. Diabetologia. 2020;63(7):1305–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedl A, Stoesz SP, Buckley P, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in normal and neoplastic human tissues: cell type-specific pattern of expression. Histochem J. 1999;3(7):433–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Y, Lam KS, Kraegen EW, et al. Lipocalin-2 is an inflammatory marker closely associated with obesity, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia in humans. Clin Chem. 2007;53(1):34–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park GY, Yu CH, Kim JS. et al. Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a potential predictor of adverse renal outcomes in immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Korean J Intern Med. 2015;30(3):345–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kjeldsen L, Johnsen AH, Sengelov H. et al. Isolation and primary structure of NGAL, a novel protein associated with human neutrophil gelatinase. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(14):10425–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Swedenborg J, Eriksson P. et al. Presence of NGAL/MMP-9 complexes in human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Thromb and Haemost. 2007;98(2):427–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aigner F, Maier HT, Schwelberger HG. et al. Lipocalin-2 regulates the inflammatory response during ischemia and reperfusion of the transplanted heart. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(4):779–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wallenius V, Elias E, Bergstorm GM. et al. The lipocalins retinol-binding protein-4, lipocalin-2 and lipocalin-type prostaglandin D2-synthase correlate with markers of inflammatory activity, alcohol intake and blood lipids, but not with insulin sensitivity in metabolically healthy 58-year-old Swedish men. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2011;119(2):75–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carmena R, Duriez P, Fruchart JC. et al. Atherogenic lipoprotein particles in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2004;109(23 Suppl 1):III2–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Otvos J. Measurement of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Clin Cardiol. 1999;22(6 Suppl):II21–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Superko HR, Nejedly M, Garrett B. et al. Small LDL and its clinical importance as a new CAD risk factor: a female case study. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2002;17(4):167–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffin BA. Lipoprotein atherogenicity: an overview of current mechanisms. Proc Nutr Soc. 1999;58(1):163–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinberg D, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE. et al. Beyond cholesterol. Modififications of low-density lipoprotein that increase its atherogenicity. N Engl J Med. 1989;6(14):915–24. 320.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Orekhov AN, Tertov VV, Mukhin DN. et al. Desialylated low density lipoprotein-naturally occurring modi-fified lipoprotein with atherogenic potency. Atherosclerosis1991;86(2–3):153–161.

  20. National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection. Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel iii) fifinal report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuller L, Arnold A, Tracy R. et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of lipoproteins and risk of coronary heart disease in the cardiovascular health study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22(7):1175–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Otvos JD, Collins D, Freedman DS. et al. Low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein particle subclasses predict coronary events and are favorably changed bygemfifibrozil therapy in the Veterans Affairs high-density lipoprotein intervention trial. Circulation. 2006;113(12):1556–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Association AD. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(Suppl1):11–S61.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sampson O, Yong G, Emmanuel AY. et al. Awareness, treatment, control, and determinants of dyslipidemia among adults in China. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Herman WW. Konzelman JL Jr, Prisant LM, et al. New national guidelines on hypertension: a summary for dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135(5): 576–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stern MP. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The “common soil” hypothesis Diabetes. 1995;44(4):369–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Luo J, Xu Q, Jiang B. et al. Selectivity, cell permeability and oral availability studies of novel bromophenol derivative HPN as protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitor. Br J Pharmacol. 2018;175(1):140–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh U, Devaraj S, Jialal I. et al. C-reactive protein stimulates myeloperoxidase release from polymorphonuclear cells and monocytes: implications for acute coronary syndromes. Clin Chem. 2009;55(2):361–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kobayashi S, Inoue N, Ohashi Y. et al. Interaction of oxidative stress and inflammatory response in coronary plaque instability: important role of C-reactive protein. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(8):1398–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bachorzewska-Gajewska H, Malyszko J, Sitniewska E. et al. NGAL (neutrophil gelatinaseassociated lipocalin) and cystatin C: are they good predictors of contrast nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable angina and normal serum creatinine. Int J Cardiol. 2008;127(2):290–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Galis ZS, Khatri JJ. et al. Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and atherogenesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Circ Res. 2002;90(3):251–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Berneis KK, Krauss RM. et al. Metabolic origins and clinical signifificance of LDL heterogeneity. J Lipid Res. 2002;43(9):1363–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hirayama S, Miida T. et al. Small dense LDL: An emerging risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;414:215–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yan QW, Yang Q, Mody N. et al. The adipokine lipocalin-2 is regulated by obesity and promotes insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2007;56(10):2533–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gerber PA, Thalhammer C, Schmied C. et al. Small, dense LDL particles predict changes in intima media thickness and insulin resistance in men with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes-a prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e72763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Shen H, Xu L, Lu J. et al. Correlation between small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and carotid artery intima-media thickness in a healthy Chinese population. Lipids Health Dis. 2015;14:137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Li G, Wu H, Wu X. et al. Small dense low density lipoprotein-cholesterol and cholesterol ratios to predict arterial stiffness progression in normotensive subjects over a 5- year period. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17(1):27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Xuzhou Central Hospital, No.199, Jiefang South Road, 221009, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China

      Yanhong Chen, Yu Fu, Shixin Wang, Yunfeng Pei, Jiao Zhang, Rui Zhang, Guoping Niu & Feng Gu

    2. Department of Cardiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, No.199, Jiefang South Road, 221009, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China

      Pengsheng Chen & Xiaoli Li

    Authors
    1. Yanhong Chen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Yu Fu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Shixin Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Pengsheng Chen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Yunfeng Pei
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Jiao Zhang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Rui Zhang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Guoping Niu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Feng Gu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Xiaoli Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Contributions

    YHC, YF and SXW contributed equally to this work. YHC, YF, SXW and XLL contributed to the conception and design of the work, data analysis, interpretation of the data, and manuscript writing; YFP, JZ, and RZ collected and analyzed data; SXW and PSC searched and interpreted the data and critically revised the manuscript; and GPN and FG contributed to the conception and design of the work, acquisition and interpretation of the data, and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for publication and they agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. XXL and FG were the guarantors of this work, and as such, had full access to all the data in the study and took responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors reviewed manuscript.

    Corresponding authors

    Correspondence to Feng Gu or Xiaoli Li.

    Ethics declarations

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xuzhou Central Hospital [XZXY-LJ-2016-119-070] and each subject provided written informed consent before participating in the study.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Additional information

    Publisher’s Note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    †Yanhong Chen, Yu Fu and Shixin Wang are contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material: Fig. S1 and Fig. S2

    Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

    Fig. S1: Fig. S2:

    Supplementary Material 1

    Lasso regression analysis. A Coefficient curves of 25 independent variables to be studied. B The best independent variable was selected by LASSO regression and 10-fold cross-validation.

    Cox model calibration curve. The re-validation of the robustness of the model, i. e. the internal validation. The results show that the prediction probability curve of the model fits well with the reference probability, which indicates that the accuracy of the model is high.

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Chen, Y., Fu, Y., Wang, S. et al. Clinical significance of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and sdLDL-C for coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged ≥ 65 years. Cardiovasc Diabetol 21, 252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-022-01668-5

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-022-01668-5

    Keywords

    Cardiovascular Diabetology

    ISSN: 1475-2840