The use of evidence-based medical therapy in patients with critical limb-threatening ischaemia

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Aug 21;30(11):1092-1100. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad022.

Abstract

Aims: To describe the practice patterns of evidence-based medical therapy (EBM) and overall mortality in high-risk patients with critical limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), compared with patients with myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods and results: Using Danish registries, we identified patients 40-100 years of age with a first-time hospitalization for CLTI or MI from 2008-2018 and grouped them into CLTI, MI, and CLTI and history of MI (CLTI + MI). We examined the likelihood of filling prescriptions with EBM [i.e. antiplatelets (Aps), lipid-lowering agents (LLAs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), or angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs)] within 3 months after discharge among survivors. Further, we assessed the adjusted 3-year mortality rates. We included 92 845 patients: 14 941 with CLTI (54.7% male), 74 830 with MI (64.6% male) and 3,074 with CLTI + MI (65.2% male). Patients with CLTI and CLTI + MI were older and had more comorbidities than patients with MI. Compared with patients with MI, the unadjusted odds ratios of filling prescriptions were 0.15 [confidence interval (CI): 0.14-0.15] for AP, 0.26 (CI: 0.25-0.27) for LLA, and 0.71 (CI: 0.69-0.74) for ARB/ACEi in patients with CLTI, and 0.22 (CI: 0.20-0.24) for AP, 0.38 (CI: 0.35-0.42) for LLA, and 1.17 (CI: 1.08-1.27) for ARB/ACEi in patients with CLTI + MI. Adjusted analyses showed similar results. Compared with patients with MI, adjusted 3-year hazard ratios for mortality were 1.69 (CI: 1.64-1.74) in patients with CLTI and 1.60 (CI: 1.51-1.69) in patients with CLTI + MI.

Conclusion: Patients with CLTI were undertreated with EBM and carried a more adverse prognosis, as compared with patients with MI, despite similar guidelines.

Keywords: Evidence-based medical therapy’; ‘Best medical therapy’; ‘Critical limb-threatening ischaemia’; ‘Guideline-recommended medical therapy’; ‘Myocardial infarction’.

Plain language summary

Patients with critical limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) have a higher risk of cardiovascular complications and death compared with patients suffering from a heart attack. Clinicians are recommended by guidelines to prescribe drugs that can reduce the risk in both patient groups.

Key findings: Patients with CLTI are undertreated, compared with patients suffering from heart attacks, despite similar treatment guidelines. Patients with CLTI had an increased risk of death compared with patients suffering from a heart attack.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists / adverse effects
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Comorbidity
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Myocardial Infarction*
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease* / diagnosis
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease* / drug therapy
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors